The useful thing about writing a dialog heavy script is that you can remove the dialog from the scenes and then layer it later as a SFX voiceover to move the story forward.
Angelo Bell's Painfully Exhilarating Adventures in Independent Filmmaking
Thursday, April 30th, 2009
Friday, April 10th, 2009
I’ve got fairly thick skin. Even in those times when my skin isn’t so thick I maintain a fairly even temperament. I understand the feedback is important in almost any endeavor or project. As a filmmaker (director/producer) it’s important to solicit feedback to make sure one’s vision isn’t tunneled. Sometimes being close to a project –especially as writer, director, producer and money man– one can lose sight of objectivity. That’s when you call on your people.
Unfortunately, what I’ve learned in the last few years is that not everyone is cut out to offer constructive criticism of one’s work. Often those of us soliciting constructive criticism choose the wrong people. That’s our fault, albeit a mistake that is easily corrected.
However, some folks might benefit from a seminar in how to offer constructive criticism. I find that people often lose sight of the “constructive” aspect and focus on the “criticism.” You’ll hear people defend their awful criticism by standing on the soapbox of truth. “I’m just being honest,” they’ll say. Whatever. There could be a million other reasons why they deliver such bad criticism. I won’t get into those. What I will address is my opinion on how to deliver constructive criticism correctly.
An important piece of the constructive criticism pie is feedback. We need to discuss what didn’t work and why. Here is where many people will drop the ball. They’ll tell you what they didn’t like and move on to the next thing they didn’t like. However, at this juncture it’s invaluable to give suggestions or alternatives, i.e. what might work. We generally have a vision in our minds, or expectations. Tell the filmmaker about those expectations. “I was expecting her to slap his face, but instead, she cried. I thought she was stronger than that.”
But we also need to discuss what did work. And why did it work? Feedback isn’t complete without these two elements.
Here is where most people not only drop the ball, but they explode it into a million pieces. Their approach sucks. It’s deplorable. It seems like they ride in like cannibalistic Hun and obliterate everything in their path. Feedback needs to be received. As such it needs to be presented as objective, purposeful and constructive. If one merely launches into a verbal or written tirade of everything that sucked, right or wrong, the filmmaker is only human. Most likely he will reject your criticism.
For example, I once received an email about my film “Broken Hearts Club.” I sent out a rough cut to be viewed. What I got back was a 2-page email of everything the person didn’t like. Immediately my warning signals went up. Was I being defensive? Was I offended? So before I replied I sent the email to two friends. I didn’t mention anything about how I felt about the email. I merely asked them to give me their opinion about the email I’d received. Both persons came back saying the same thing: “Damn, is there anything they liked about the film?”
I recently received another email about the film. While I prepared myself for the worse (I always do) I was pleasantly surprised to read the criticism. Here is a brief intro to the email:
Thanx for the disc- I couldn’t play it all on my DVD but got bits and pieces- it looks great! Never got the script other though…lemme know. My thoughts, if I may say with the most supportive of offers and as a friend after all the creative time we’ve spent together…in some areas the music underscore may be working against the emotional and dramatic thrust of the film.
Now, whether I agree or not, this person certainly has my attention. He has positioned this as a “creative” critique. He has reminded me that we’ve worked together successfully on multiple projects. He confirms his support of the project. And he starts off on a positive note. The email continues with more detail and most importantly, not only does he give me a suggestion as an alternative, he gives me a specific example about how this alternative has worked in the past.
As it turns out I love the score that was composed specifically for the film. It’s beautiful and emotional. However, I am not the audience for my film. As such I had to look at two things:
So now I have direction. A filmmaker (or editor, or post-production supervisor) without a direction is useless. I also can compel myself into a deeper clarity of vision during the post process. A nice side-affect to this is that I have a new and fresh perspective for the film. I felt in my bones that it needed something. By soliciting for objective feedback, even after receiving poor feedback, I’ve found a new direction.
Wednesday, April 1st, 2009
Thursday, March 26th, 2009
I put the final touches to the corporate video I was editing today. I deliver it tomorrow and then I’ll order DVD copies as my client needs then. I was surprised that it came out as good as it did. Actually not surprised-surprised, more like “happy”.
Taking time away from the current sitch with NBFF was refreshing. I did send out notices to DV Republic and four other local newspapers and ezines about what has transpired over the past few days. But after that I stepped away to get back in touch with me. I got a wee bit angry today about some related matters. I guess disappointed is more like it. Basically sometimes we think folks “got our backs” but in the end, they don’t. Flip side is, it’s surprising and comforting when someone comes out of nowhere and they do “have your back.” Basically sometimes you thing folks do, but they don’t. Then you think some folks don’t, but they do. It’s a weird world we live in.
But I did my silent fuming and now I’m over it. I’ve got films to edit, scripts to write, a web series to develop, DVD releases to promote and money to make.
I’ve chattied with a friend in Florida about the concept of making a web series using a Flip Video camera. Since we’re so far apart the projects will most likely be separate but it’ll be fun comparing notes. I think we both have a few loose ends with other films to tie up first. I know comedy is what generally generates a nice audience when it comes to web series but I think I want to do a drama. Some deeply profound shit, like spousal abuse and drug addiction. We’ll see.
Thursday, March 26th, 2009
Something has been on my mind for a few weeks and now it’s time to commit. There’s no way I am going to finish my b-cinema film “Pulp Fusion: The Resurrection of Serious Rogers” within the original timetable. There have been far too many events out of my control that have delayed it. So, it’s time to roll with the punches and adjust my timetable. I think pushing everything back until the end of April will work well.
Pushing the deadline for the rough cut back to April also allows me to focus on “pushing” news about the release of the first Pulp Fusion series DVD, “The Raw Shorts” which is a collection of five short films from myself and Daryll Harkless. The DVD is currently available on CreateSpace (www.createspace.com/263219) and will soon be on Amazon.com, Amazon Unbox. At some point the shorts collection will also be available for VOD.
These changes give me time to work on creating opportunities to screen the “The Resurrection of Serious Rogers” locally when it is ready.
Lastly, there are a few changes I plan to make to my film, “The Broken Hearts Club” as well, in preparation for the film to go direct-to-DVD sometime this fall.
Saturday, August 9th, 2008
I’ve been away — so to speak — for a little while and the blogs have slipped by the wayside. In a nutshell I’ve been scrambling to complete Broken Hearts Club, or at least a very good close-to final cut. My composer delivered another version of a cue I needed for the BBQ scene and it was great. Just one more to go.
In the interim I’ve been trying my damnedest to equalize the sound before I jump into a rudimentary sound mix and sound design. Truthfully, my goal is just to keep the sound from sucking ass as much as possible. The sound for BHC really isn’t bad, not like in the old days of my first filmmaking endeavors, LOL. I did have challenges, like missing files from DAT tapes and bad on-set sound, but I’ve managed to edit my way around them.
I simply need to close this chapter and move on to the next. That means getting BHC out of its holding pattern and in a picture lock state (albeit temporary) so I can handle the other things I need to do. Like writing. It’s already August and I’ve only written one script this year. I need another one. But which? Black Mountain will take me months and months to complete a very rough draft. The Wedding Conspiracy will take at least two months for a rough draft. However, I think the latter will be much more commercial coming out the gate with BHC.
So, what’s with the title of this blog, Gone Baby, Gone?
Well, this is a twist on my goal of naming my blogs after film titles. Almost. I guess you can say this is a two part title-r. See, I watched Director Ben Affleck’s Gone Baby Gone last night and I have to say it was the most completely entertaining, well-written, well-acted, well-directed film I’ve scene in a decade. I am going to add it to my DVD library.
The film is near perfect. The storytelling and the characters are so authentic it’s almost surreal. And the core theme of the story, the dichotomy of right vs right (there’s no misspelling there!) is impeccably approached without preachiness. In fact, at the end, while there are two seemingly “right” choices it was hard for me to speak out against or for the lead actor’s final decision. It made me think. If you want to see a good film, a really good film, Gone Baby Gone is a must. Rent it.
Now onto the second part of this blog. Lately I’ve felt like I’ve been spinning my wheels burning the candle at both ends and in the middle. There’s been very little structure to the things I’ve done. I’ve tackled this project, then that one, then the other one. As I get closer to the early bird submission deadline for Sundance I need more structure and focus in my activities. I need to create a measurable plan so I can go back and look at my results and see if I truly got the entire job done, not just pieces of the project.
I’ve abandoned my plan of embargoing BHC and instead I am going to spread it out far and wide. I’m going to start with sending copies to several critics and then move on to talent agencies. I’ve got a little buzz project for Sundance and Slamdance too, which are the next two über-important film festivals coming up. While Slamdance is technically harder to get into because of its limited screenings the film festival rivals Sundance in its ability to get filmmakers seen and sold. Summarily, I need to be able to check my results at the end of each month and see measurable progress.
To ensure this progress I need to compose a very thorough “to do” list. I’m working on it this weekend. Early next week I expect to receive three books I ordered about film financing, distribution and film business plans. These books should help me get a handle on marketing and distribution processes for BHC and pre-production financing solicitations for my other film, The Wall.
When I get all these things into place, complacency will be gone baby, gone, replaced by a definitive plan to get me from the D-list to the A-list.
Tuesday, July 1st, 2008
Monday:
I woke up not wanting to go to work today. In fact, I thought if I did go into work I would surely hand in my resignation. I’m not a young man anymore. I can keep burning the candle at both ends without everything going up in flames. It’s time to step out on faith and go 100% for my dreams. We’ll see.
As it turns out I didn’t have to go to work. My eldest daughter, Israel, was ill this weekend so I took her to the doctor. There I was, the only dood in the place (except for the doctor) ushering around an 8 and 7 year old girl and lugging a 25-lbs 8-month-old boy over my shoulder like a duffle bag.
Can you say, “fun?”
Later that evening I spent five hours editing the “Season of Change” music video for David Redic. I finally met the director of the music video, Lewis Powell. A very cool gent and very serious about his art. He had recently gotten back from a week-long trip to Cannes for the festival. We chatted it up about Cannes and the conections he’s made and I found out that he has a finished docu-comedy/drama called “How 2 Build a Rapper.” Apparently several distributors are interested in this documentary (a la “This is Spinal Tap“) about making a rapper in these modern times.
We hit it off and spent the next four hours shoulder-to-shoulder editing his video. We came up with some distinctive looks for the film. We turned an otherwise unassuming performance shot into a constrast masterpiece using effects in Final Cut Pro and my filters from Nattress. The cool part is that although I volunteered to edit the video for free (I believe in the song and the theme AND it’s for Barack Obama’s campaign) I am still basically an “employee” of sorts. It wasn’t my time to put on my director’s cap. It was my time to listen, offer my input and then basically do what I was asked. But both David and Lewis placed a lot of value on my opinion. If felt good.
We’re almost done with the video. Perhaps in another week or two. Also today I chatted it up with my composer regarding the final songs for Broken Hearts Club. We’re going to be shuffling around songs since I am cutting some scenes. I also got a call from John Fiore today, which was cool because I’d recently had to nix a scene I was going to use him in. But being a filmmaker himself he was very understanding of the process.
Still haven’t had a time to 1) send my footage to Atlanta or 2) start working on my new trailer. Hope to do that soon.
Hmmm…maybe I’ll resign from my job tomorrow
Thursday, June 26th, 2008
It’s Wednesday? Oh, I must be cutting a music video!
It’s 12:19 and I just finished editing a rough cut of the music video footage compiled by a friend of my DP’s. It’s a four-minute song, inspirational with gospel overtones. Basically think “I Believe I Can Fly” with some Fred Hammond or Kirk Franklin thrown in for good measure. I didn’t shoot any of the 3 hours of footage but I heard the song and volunteered to edit the video for free. The dood, David Redic is a volunteer with Barack Obama’s campaign and he’s trying to get it into Obama’s hands.
I actually had fun. I’m not a big fan of syncing audio and video during the editing process, but when you’re cutting a music video what other process is there. My exprience synching audio on my film Broken Hearts Club helped a great deal. It was quick and painless.
This video was the first thing I’ve edited on my Macbook Pro using Final Cut Studio 2. As I said, I had lots of fun and it was a welcome diversion. Unfortunately I’m sure I won’t be able to post it. I doubt David will give me permission since they’re really trying to keep a lid on it until it’s completely done.
The song is called, Season of Change. The footage was four performance sequences that I mixed with photos of Barack. I cut it simply using a lots of dissolves, some overlays and a few jumpcuts. I threw in two Nattress filters. Other than that is was very very simple.
Monday, June 23rd, 2008
I have been mulling over some ideas to bring my film’s current TRT down from 115 to 95. When the first rough cut came in at nearly two hours, with five scenes left to shoot I didn’t freak out. I know how these things change. Unfortunately, many folks around me started freaking out. I got comments like,
“My God, a two hour movie? You can’t have two hour movie!”
“You gotta cut it down, you gotta cut it down!”
“No one’s going to watch a two hour movie!”
“What are you going to do?”
“Oh, the agony, the agony of cutting! Arrrgggh!”
Ah well, so much for individuality, right? If an indie filmmaker makes an film that runs two hours he shouldn’t automatically be quantified as self-indulgent nor be subject to an extra dose of scrutiny. There are very successful indie films that have run two hours. In fact I just watched a Wong Kar Wai film that ran 125 minutes. However, there are some very important things to consider. One, I’m not Wong Kar Wai
Two, my goal is to get this film distributed theatrically and I have to think like a distributor. And three, there’s always a viable Plan B if you look at all the options and think outside the box.
So, over the past few days I’ve been thinking about how I can cut down my film. Every scene went into a mental chopping block. EVERY SCENE. Every actor became subject to a dialog-reduction process. Fact is, my scenes are long because I wrote a lot of dialog, albeit colorful and irreverent. But, I can cut it down. So I will.
As I acquiesced to the TRT reduction I thought, “Okay, I guess I just have to sacrifice those scenes for the greater good of higher distribution prospects” and then it hit me — why should I leave those scenes on teh cutting room floor forever?
Ever heard of ‘the director’s cut?’ Sure, the directors cut! How about DVD distribution (post theatrical) with thirty minutes of additional footage? Is that a cool selling tool or what? I can read it now:
Broken Hearts Club: The Director’s Cut features 33 minutes of extra footage not see in the movies!
Um, like, yeah. I can totally deal with that, dood. Like totally.
So, I’ll be cut-cut-cutting away. Free of second thoughts, fears etc. And waiting for my cut scenes to be resurrected during the DVD distribution.
I’ll be taking 115 down to 95 and in doing so, making a “right” turn.